JTSR71
Pardon my bluntness, but,
circularity and repetitiveness is not proof ,
You appear , through various threads, to be arguing vociferously, that cell nuvo ,as personified by Tom Mannix, is not the best company for nth circle forum readers to be placing their faith ( time or dollars in) in.
Why?
Please lay out all you arguments in one place at one time..
I'm not going to write a dissertation on this for you! Sorry!
You could just read the 1 star reviews on the play store since August. Check with mmfacemm and anyone else to exclude ones they consider to be fake.
I think andrew todd is kinda messing with his buddy Tom with his review. "Great app. If I had found it 2 years ago, I would have saved a ton of money on cell service."
He isn't saying now that he's found it he'll be saving a ton of money going forward. It's more like he's saying he wish he knew about it back when the cell service actually worked (February to mid-August).
I also think SuccessOne's review is great cuz it sends everybody to the nth forum where they can see with their own eyes that even mmfacemm and KentE have been saying "If I had 13 gold I wouldn't stick around" and "I wouldn't sign up for a new plan under current circumstances".
Lulz...
JTSR71
"I'm not going to write a dissertation on this for you! Sorry!"
No dissertation necessary.(smile).
Please, just one cogent post laying out all your arguments.
Iif we are left without substantive arguments
we are left to the the possible conclusion that all your posts may be simply another misdirection among many..
I don't know who you mean when you say "we", but I'm pretty satisfied that those who are capable of being persuaded that cellnuvo is a scam have been persuaded as such, and those few who are left not believing that will continue to believe in Tom no matter what.
You can tell they're politicians. Mannix says nothing in his review and todd review is a "what if". They can technically say they haven't lied and they're using suggestion as a persuasive device. Believe it or not, some fall for this every day which is why people like them still do it.
So, It was all just an exercise in persuasion:(
Rats in a skinner box.(sad).
"I don't know who you mean when you say "we", but I'm pretty satisfied that those who are capable of being persuaded that cellnuvo is a scam have been persuaded as such, and those few who are left not believing that will continue to believe in Tom no matter what."
Lol it is extremely funny you think you persuaded anyone. All of us who actually use the service know exactly what we have gotten ourselves into and experience it all first hand. You really think you have anything to add to that?
You don't seem to get that people who have gold have nothing to lose to keep the account open. That doesn't make them pro-cellnuvo. If they have a hope to redeem gold that is fine. It doesn't mean they believe anything the company says. They don't need to. If cellnuvo bring something new out they can try it for 1 minute and if it doesn't work then they are no worse off than they were before. If they choose to swipe then that is their choice.
mmfacamm, your paragraph 2 is summed up in one word...ambivalence.
Do people have a passion for ambivalence though? This is a thread about reviews, okay?
Can we put you down as a 3 and call it good? We would also like to restrict you to one vote.
And 4 months later, here we are.
I get that for politicians committing to specific deliverables by specific dates is irrelevant when they can just use soundbites, promises and attacks on the other side, but for everyone else, the world doesn't work that way.
I have no 'skin in this fight."
I simply object to comments and tirades taking over an otherwise useful, invaluable knowledgeable resource.
Well this thread is about Play Store reviews LOL. Folks on here tend to get tied up in knots.
Whoever first simplified it "Just gimme a number okay? 1 to 5" was a genius. Who can get mad at a number???!!!
Okay put me down as a 3.
IJTSR71 " don't know who you mean when you say "we", but I'm pretty satisfied that those who are capable of being persuaded that cellnuvo is a scam have been persuaded as such, and those few who are left not believing that will continue to believe in Tom no matter what."
Nice evasion of the original question,
"Please, just one cogent post laying out all your arguments.
Iif we are left without substantive arguments
we are left to the the possible conclusion that all your posts may be simply another misdirection among many.."
Care to elucidate instead of obfuscate?
:Please, just one cogent post laying out all your arguments.
If EDIT for clarity, we ( members of this forum) are left without substantive arguments, only insinuations from all of your posts
we (clarifying language,( members of this forum)are left to the the possible conclusion that all your posts may be simply another misdirection among many.."
Hi als.
I'm really having a hard time understanding exactly what it is you want me to write and why you need it.
Maybe to help me, you could provide an example?
Let's take your following statement:
Can you provide the thing you seek from me applied to your R+ statement so that I can have clarity about your request? To wit:
I wish to respectfully address your posts across many topics, threads on nth circle regarding cell nuvo., and Tom Mannix in particular.
The nut of your posts appears to be,
that cellnuvo is a scam .
Rather than proceeding on faith/ unsubstantiated claims I'd prefer to see
one cogent post laying out all your arguments.
"Hi als.
I'm really having a hard time understanding exactly what it is you want me to write and why you need it.
Maybe to help me, you could provide an example?
Let's take your following statement:
als wrote: Ringplus, the cell provider s@#$#%.
I'd apply the designation INTERNUT to ringplus the company without hesitation.
Can you provide the thing you seek from me applied to your R+ statement so that I can have clarity about your request? To wit:
als wrote: Please, just one cogent post laying out all your arguments.
Iif we are left without substantive arguments
we are left to the the possible conclusion that all your posts may be simply another misdirection among many..
I prefer to say slight of hand
I just took a look at its review in google play.
I have to say anyone giving it a 5 star rate after October 2017 is a pathetic liar.
I did not rate it because there is no negative or zero rate.