Thanks again for the treasure trove of information. These findings ought to be required reading for all US citizens prior to the yearly state of the union speech.
Although the people who produced these important findings have warned about careless interpretation of the comparisons, just about any interpretation of the data must conclude that the USA is average or below in, at least, the Childhood categories that are of utmost importance to a country's well being and future. In short, the US is in dire straits.
What I find interesting is that data such as this has been around in one form or another for many years, and yet it has rarely been discussed or acknowledged in American social or political discourse. I can remember reading 30+ years ago how the top,straight A students in the US would be just average students in many other developed countries, a fact that still holds true. The fact that we have a problem disclosing and discussing our shortcomings does not bode well for the future. It is ironic that every election people talk about fixing education, healthcare, our broken economy, and many other things, and yet they are not only not fixed, but become worse in many cases. Obviously, it is doubtful that President Trump had any of the above stats in mind when he vowed to make America great again, but if he did, he has an extremely huge and tough row to hoe. But let's give him some credit for the "inherited a mess" statement. Have we become an ostrich republic?
*** A personal side note about the "Headstart" government funded early childhood education program in the US: When my wife retired from her normal job, she decided to work for Headstart, not for the mere pittance that they pay, but because she liked young kids and thought she might actually do a little good. One thing she discovered was that because the employees, at least at that time, were barely paid above minimum wage, Headstart had hired many people who were not, so to say, the best money could buy. This is not to say that there were not dedicated employees who were quite capable, but it is to say that many employees, who had been relieved of their duties at other educational venues, were willing to work there because they could and for little pay. Many of the "better' employees would use Headstart as a springboard to a better working environment with better pay, which is understandable given that their pay at Headstart would almost qualify them to enroll their own children in Headstart, assuming that was their only income.So, in this case, we obviously need to devote more money to early childhood education, not to mention teacher's pay at all levels of education. Children do deserve the best.