Limit the amount of new threads.

More
3 years 11 months ago #21 by realLexusl21
That much? 29 threads? That is insane.
Shows agenda

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
3 years 11 months ago #22 by KentE

3 per month is a bit extreme. 3 per week might be better.

How to police it... well it appears that only three people broke that rule this past week. How about naming and shaming...

In third place is me .... with 4 threads :(
In second place is PEW with 8 threads :unsure:
And the loser is JTSR71 with 29 threads!! :ohmy:




Thanks for the tally! Even more remarkable is that JTSR71 missed a couple of days of activity, so it's really closer to a 40-threads--per-week rate. It's not discussion, it's a campaign.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Legally-Speaking
  • Legally-Speaking's Avatar
  • Visitor
  • Visitor
3 years 11 months ago #23 by Legally-Speaking
Replied by Legally-Speaking on topic Limit the amount of new threads.

3 per month is a bit extreme. 3 per week might be better.

How to police it... well it appears that only three people broke that rule this past week. How about naming and shaming...

In third place is me .... with 4 threads :(
In second place is PEW with 8 threads :unsure:
And the loser is JTSR71 with 29 threads!! :ohmy:




With OP's obvious goal being directed at suppressing JTSR71's forum participation, what's the collateral damage count using OP's suggested 3/mo. How many unintended victims would his rule adversely affect?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
3 years 11 months ago #24 by realLexusl21
I hope he goes on another vacation and maybe get in trouble for harassment

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
3 years 11 months ago #25 by mmfacemm


With OP's obvious goal being directed at suppressing JTSR71's forum participation, what's the collateral damage count using OP's suggested 3/mo. How many unintended victims would his rule adversely affect?


Don't know - feel free to do the tally. If you want to prove a point you have to do the work!

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Legally-Speaking
  • Legally-Speaking's Avatar
  • Visitor
  • Visitor
3 years 11 months ago - 3 years 11 months ago #26 by Legally-Speaking
Replied by Legally-Speaking on topic Limit the amount of new threads.


With OP's obvious goal being directed at suppressing JTSR71's forum participation, what's the collateral damage count using OP's suggested 3/mo. How many unintended victims would his rule adversely affect?


Don't know - feel free to do the tally. If you want to prove a point you have to do the work!


No need. Op proved it for me with his prior post:

"I hope he goes on another vacation and maybe get in trouble for harassment."

'Nuf said.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.